c++: class scope function lookup [PR105908]

In r12-1273 for PR91706, I removed the code in get_class_binding that
stripped BASELINK.  This testcase demonstrates that we still need to strip
it in outer_binding before putting the overload set in IDENTIFIER_BINDING,
for compatibility with bindings added directly for declarations.

	PR c++/105908

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* name-lookup.cc (outer_binding): Strip BASELINK.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/cpp0x/trailing16.C: New test.

2 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc
index 7b0638d3166..56256babda8 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc
@@ -7626,6 +7626,10 @@ outer_binding (tree name,
                 /* Thread this new class-scope binding onto the
                    IDENTIFIER_BINDING list so that future lookups
                    find it quickly.  */
+                if (BASELINK_P (class_binding->value))
+                  /* Don't put a BASELINK in IDENTIFIER_BINDING.  */
+                  class_binding->value
+                    = BASELINK_FUNCTIONS (class_binding->value);
                 class_binding->previous = outer;
                 if (binding)
                   binding->previous = class_binding;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/trailing16.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/trailing16.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4feb3f81c27
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/trailing16.C
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// PR c++/105908
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct test
+{
+  template <typename T>
+  int templated_func();
+
+  template <typename T>
+  auto call_templated_func() -> decltype(templated_func<T>());
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+auto test::call_templated_func() -> decltype(templated_func<T>())
+{
+  return templated_func<T>();
+}